Jul 222017
 

Jon-Emile S. Kenny MD [@heart_lung]

Three years ago I wanted to share my physiology website heart-lung.org; I needed a topic to stoke some interest, so I sent a brief essay to Matt here at pulmccm.org.  In it, I briefly described inspiratory IVC collapse and its relationship to volume status and volume responsiveness.  With this, the series of ‘1000 Words’ was borne and a few people started to watch my moving Guyton Diagrams.

Rightly, I was delighted to read Dr. Marik’s very recent take on IVC collapse and thank Scott for posting my vodcast on the topic.  The discussion also included a very thoughtful essay by Rory Spiegel.

As well, I’m placing my vodcast here; the animation is a simplified illustration of the intricate intersection of venous return and cardiac function – two broad hemodynamic processes that seesaw within waxing and waning thoracic and abdominal pressures.

PEEP & IVC Collapse

In the video above, the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP] on IVC collapse is mentioned.  PEEP has conflicting effects on all of the four general elements that determine IVC size and collapse – venous return, cardiac function, intra-thoracic pressure [ITP] and intra-abdominal pressure [IAP].  An often overlooked, but terribly relevant, investigation is that of Juhl-Olsen and colleagues [1].

Healthy volunteers had their volume status altered and IVC collapsibility was measured at varying degrees of PEEP and pressure support.  While there are multiple avenues of discussion on this paper, a few interesting observations are noted below [see their figure 4]:

Healthy volunteers lying in the horizontal tended to increase the IVC collapsibility index with the application of 10 cm H2O of PEEP from a baseline of 0.15 to about 0.20.  When PEEP rose to 20 cmH2O, the collapsibility index fell to an intermediary value between 0.15 and 0.20.

When placed in Trendelenberg, given 1 L of NS and administered 20 cmH2O of PEEP, their IVC collapsibility was also about 0.15; i.e. an equivalent collapse to their supine, volume unloaded physiology without PEEP. 

How might these results be reconciled?  A detailed evaluation of end-expiratory pressure and its effects on the 4 key determinants of IVC size and collapsibility [venous return, cardiac function, ITP and IAP] can provide a pathway for understanding.  These will be discussed in more detail in part 2.

Please check out other posts in this series,

JE

 

 

 

 

  1. Juhl-Olsen, P., C.A. Frederiksen, and E. Sloth, Ultrasound assessment of inferior vena cava collapsibility is not a valid measure of preload changes during triggered positive pressure ventilation: a controlled cross-over study. Ultraschall Med, 2012. 33(2): p. 152-9.

 

Liked this post? Get a weekly email update, and explore our library of clinical guidelines, practice updatesreview articles. and board review questions.

PulmCCM is an independent publication not affiliated with or endorsed by any other organization, society or journal referenced on the website. (Terms of Use | Privacy Policy)

Authors: contribute your work in a guest post.

0 Comments

ICU Physiology in 1000 Words: IVC Collapse, Revisited – Part 1