Exhaled Nitric Oxide Analysis for Respiratory Disease: ATS Guideline
A blue ribbon panel led by Raed Dweik releases this ATS practice guideline, recommending when & how to use exhaled nitric oxide (FE-NO) for use in diagnosing and treating inflammatory respiratory conditions. FE-NO’s uses, they say, include:
- Predicting responsiveness to corticosteroid therapy
- Helping diagnose asthma in uncertain situations
- Monitoring airway inflammation in asthma, and possibly adherence with steroid therapy
- Diagnosing eosinophilic airway inflammation (due to asthma or eosinophilic bronchitis)
As with many biomarkers, individuals vary widely in FE-NO, resulting in normal/abnormal overlap and useless reference ranges. Rather, cut-off points are suggested, based on various prevalence studies:
- >50 parts per billion FE-NO (>35 ppb in kids): a symptomatic patient will likely respond to corticosteroids.
- 25-50 ppb (20-35 ppb in kids): Indeterminate; use clinical judgment
- <25 ppb (<20 ppb in kids): Steroid responsiveness is unlikely.
A standard FE-NO analyzer (NIOS, Aerocrine) cost $43,000 recently. That company is marketing a smaller, more portable and far cheaper version. The idea being that (if third-party payers pay physicians adequately to use the machine) average pulmonary practices may adopt this technology and use it to fine-tune or personalize care for patients with asthma or other, rarer inflammatory lung diseases. Expect early-adopter academic centers and large community practices in urban areas to jump in first, competing for “cutting-edge asthma therapy” bragging rights.
Dweik RA et al. An Official ATS Clinical Practice Guideline: Interpretation of Exhaled Nitric Oxide Levels (FENO) for Clinical Applications. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 2011;184:602-615.
Liked this post? Get a weekly email update (no spam, ever), and explore our library of pulmonary and critical care guidelines, practice updates and review articles.


September JAMA 2012: no difference in clinical control
Does this really help? Or are we looking for more technology?