Semuloparin (a new LMWH) reduced DVT & PE in chemotherapy patients (RCT, NEJM) - PulmCCM
Advertisement
Feb 282012
 

For unclear reasons, people receiving chemotherapy for solid tumors are at particularly increased risk for deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (DVT/PE). Semuloparin is an ultra-low-molecular weight heparin with a long half life of 16-20 hours that (like enoxaparin) is renally excreted. Sanofi, makers of Lovenox, report in the February 16 New England Journal of Medicine that semuloparin significantly reduced rates of symptomatic DVT and PE in SAVE-ONCO, a large, Phase III randomized controlled trial, led by Giancarlo Agnelli et al.

What They Did:

Sanofi (who designed and managed the trial) randomized 3,172 patients undergoing chemotherapy for solid cancers (lung, pancreas, stomach, colon, rectal, bladder, or ovary), good performance status (ECOG 3+), and a life expectancy > 3 months to receive either semuloparin 20 mg or placebo subcutaneously once daily, for as long as patients were getting chemo.

The primary outcome was a combined endpoint of symptomatic DVT, any pulmonary embolism, or unexplained death. A co-primary safety outcome was major bleeding (hemoglobin drop >= 2 mg/dL or serious clinically).

Sanofi collected and analyzed all the data, but investigators report they had access to all data. Investigators wrote the first draft of the manuscript, and Sanofi’s medical communications company (Excerpta Medica) edited it.

What They Found:
  • Semuloparin significantly reduced the rate of the composite endpoint, with 20 of 1,608 patients (1.2%) in the semuloparin group and 55 of 1,604 (3.4%) in the placebo group experiencing DVT, PE, or death compatible with undiagnosed PE.
  • This was an absolute difference of 2.2% and a relative reduction of 74%.
  • Number needed to treat to prevent one event in the composite endpoint would be 46.
  • There was no difference between the groups in overall survival (secondary endpoint) nor in the rate of fatal pulmonary embolism.
  • Semuloparin caused surprisingly little bleeding: there was no increased major bleeding in the semuloparin group overall (1.2% vs. 1.1%); there was a slight increase in minor bleeding (1.6% vs. 0.9%). Semuloparin did not produce an excess of adverse events over placebo, and there were no cases of heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT).

In a a 2011 Cochrane analysis of 9 randomized trials, Elie Aki and Holger Schunemann concluded that prophylactic heparin did improve overall survival at 2 years (but not at 1 year) in chemotherapy patients. They absorb the SAVE-ONCO data (which included more patients than all 9 previous trials) into a new analysis, and conclude in their associated NEJM editorial:

If 1000 patients with cancer were to use a prophylactic dose of low-molecular-weight heparin, over a period of 12 months death would be averted in approximately 30 patients, venous thromboembolism would be averted in 20, and 1 would have a major bleeding episode.

Those are pretty compelling numbers to me (which makes me think they’ll be eye-popping miracles to most oncologists). This paper was initially presented at the ASCO meeting in June 2011, where it was selected for the “best of ASCO.” Major specialty societies don’t currently recommend prophylactic low-molecular weight heparin for all patients undergoing chemotherapy for solid tumors, but I wouldn’t be surprised to see that change.

Agnelli G et al. Semuloparin for Thromboprophylaxis in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy for Cancer. N Engl J Med 2012;366:601-609.

Liked this post? Get a weekly email update (no spam, ever), and explore our library of pulmonary and critical care guidelines, practice updates and review articles.

PulmCCM is an independent publication, not affiliated with or endorsed by any other organization, society and/or journal referenced on the website.

  One Response to “Semuloparin (a new LMWH) reduced DVT & PE in chemotherapy patients (RCT, NEJM)”

  1. My husband was diagnosed with Colon Cancer in July 2012. He underwent colon resection and chemo was started in September 2012. He developed DVT in January in his right thigh and has been in the hospital for 17 days now with Sepsis and Mrsa. Is this all related? The doctors, and he has many have stated it’s a day to day prognosis and he’ll have good days and bad days. He will remain on antibiotics for at least 6 weeks. He hasn’t walked in 3 weeks and has lost over 40 lbs. I ask what is his prognosis and they state there’s always hope. They are not forthcoming with much information…can you help?

Leave a Comment