Fellows: This is your brain on protocols (JAMA) - PulmCCM
Advertisement
May 052012
 
policy ethics education review mechanical ventilation review jama critical care review  Fellows: This is your brain on protocols (JAMA)
(image: flickrCC)

Do protocols make trainees’ brains go soft? That’s the assertion of more than a few crusty hard-liners who miss the good old days — when you got 2-liter tidal volumes for your ARDS and liked it, dad-gum-it!!

Prasad et al can’t say whether critical care fellows can actually run ventilators in the post-protocol age … but they do test well, apparently. Authors cleverly linked performance on the mechanical ventilation questions on the ABIM critical care boards to whether the test-taking fellow came from a program with ventilator protocols in place. They even tried to find a dose-response relationship, according to a program’s number of extant protocols. (Interestingly, 31% of 88 programs reported using no protocols at all.)

Who wins this debate? Well, the presence of protocols had no relationship to fellows’ performance on the vent questions on the ABIM critical care boards. But (I can hear it now) that doesn’t prove anything! In my day, we had to build each ventilator ourselves — using a radiator hose, a package of water balloons, and a Slinky. And don’t even get me started on ECMO!

Prasad M et al. Clinical Protocols and Trainee Knowledge About Mechanical Ventilation. JAMA 2011;306:935-941. 

Liked this post? Get a weekly email update (no spam, ever), and explore our library of clinical guidelines, practice updatesreview articles. and board review questions.

PulmCCM is an independent publication, not affiliated with or endorsed by any other organization, society or journal referenced on the website.

Authors: contribute your work to PulmCCM Journal or in a guest blog post.

Leave a Comment